Coffee news and miscellany

Specialty coffee on NPR

The Kojo Nnamdi show, out of WAMU in Washington, DC, had a segment on specialty coffee this week. Guests were Counter Culture’s Peter Giuliano (gratuitous photo of Peter and I at right; I’ve been waiting for an excuse to post this); Ric Rhinehart, Executive Director of the Specialty Coffee Association of America; Ryan Jensen, owner of Peregrine Espresso in DC; and Dale Roberts, owner of Java Shack in Arlington, VA.

Last month the Washington Post also had a terrific article about Counter Culture.

While I’m giving some love to great coffee and Counter Culture, the new crop of their Finca Nueva Armenia is in, and it is as fantastic, if not more so, than it was when we reviewed it last year. This is organic and also certified Smithsonian Bird-Friendly (although not marketed as such by Counter Culture) — it’s as good as super-sustainable coffee gets.

Caffeine-free coffee species one of top 10 new species in 2008

A species of naturally caffeine-free coffee from the Cameroon, Coffea charrieriana, has been named one of the top ten new species described in 2009 by the International Institute for Species Exploration (IISE) at Arizona State University.

The coffee was actually collected in 1983. Cuttings were cultivated in a research collection and remained unstudied by taxonomists until 1997. It wasn’t until last year that a description of it as a newly described species was published. The original cuttings from the plants were collected in wet, primary rainforest on a steep, rocky slope in the Bakossi Forest Reserve, Tombel Division, Southwest Province, Cameroon, at an elevation of 160 m. It is one of only a few species of caffeine-free Coffeas, and the first from Central Africa.

The top ten species from the previous year are announced by the IISE along with the release of the annual State of Species report, which discusses the status of our knowledge of earth’s species and summarizes the number of species newly described in the most recent year for which complete data are available. The 2009 report discusses the over 18,000 new species discovered in 2007. The report is produced in partnership with the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, the International Plant Names Index, Thomson Reuters (publisher of Zoological Record) and the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.

Stoffelen, P., M. Noirot, E. Couturon & F. Anthony. 2008. A new caffeine-free coffee from Cameroon. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 158: 67-72.

My mug is on In My Mug

One of the best things to happen at the the Specialty Coffee Association of America expo in Atlanta this year was meeting coffee people I had only corresponded with up to that time. Surely one of the highlights was getting to meet and talk to Steve Leighton of Has Bean Coffee in the U.K. I’ve been a secret fan of Steve’s for a long time. In addition to sourcing great coffees, he has excellent descriptions on his web site, travels frequently to origin and blogs about his experiences and other coffee news, and through his strong online presence really conveys his passion for coffee. Every roaster should aspire to communicate to consumers about coffee the way Steve does.

One of Steve’s gigs is In My Mug, a weekly video in which he describes a particular coffee he offers. Somewhere along the line people started sending him mugs to use in the videos. When I got home from Atlanta the first thing I did was send Steve a mug. Since Coffee & Conservation doesn’t have a mug, I sent him the simple but stylish Rouge River Bird Observatory mug from my real job.

This week Steve used the mug to review his Guatemala San Rafael Pacun, a 2008 Cup of Excellence winner. I should say that the second thing I did, once I packed the mug and sent it overseas, was place an order from Steve. Shipping is a bit pricey from the U.K. to the U.S., but I got my coffee just five days after ordering/roasting. Although I didn’t order the Guatemala, the coffees I got were excellent — especially the Bolivia Machacamarca, which Irish barista champion Colin Harmon served us in a cappuccino while he was practicing for the WBC finals.

Thanks, Steve, for the C&C shout out, and for your fantastic coffee!

Sustainability at the SCAA expo

Having “green” conferences is all the rage the last few years. I’ve been to a few in my field. Of course, a bunch of ornithologists more or less just listens to research presentations — overall not much in the way of consumables. A trade show, on the other hand, is another story. As it was last year, the recent Specialty Coffee Association of America expo was billed as a “green” conference. Here were the measures the organization announced they were taking to minimize the impact on the environment:

  • Part of the fee went to planting trees in a coffee-growing country to make the conference carbon-neutral.
  • Attendee brochures (40 pages) were not mailed out, saving paper and transportation fuel costs. They were available on the expo web site…many stacks of them. The brochures were perfect bound, which may have made them harder to recycle. I didn’t check to see if they were printed on recycled paper, but I believe it was glossy.
  • Participants were asked to fill out session and conference evaluation forms online.
  • All of the many large vinyl banners inside and out of the expo venue (like the ones shown above) will be made into tote bags which were available for pre-order.
  • Coffee grounds were donated to a worm farm or nursery in the Atlanta area.

The real waste at one of these shows occurs on the expo floor. There were hundreds of vendor booths, and many of them offered coffee (or smoothie or tea) samples — in little disposable paper cups. How many thousands of cups were used for 10 seconds before heading to the landfill? Were any made from recycled paper? This bothered us so much last year that this year we brought our own espresso shot glasses and used them. Saves paper, and the coffee tastes better.

The Counter Culture Coffee booth was the only one we noted that solved the problem by using small ceramic cups (29 cents at IKEA), shown here with barista Lem Butler. Their whole booth was inspiring, and keeping with the company goal of zero waste. The exterior was made of Plyboo — a formaldehyde-free, Forest Council-certified bamboo material, while the frames were lightweight aluminum and the countertop stainless steel (all recyclable). Carpet squares were recyclable FLOR carpet tiles, and LED lighting was used. CCC was also using locally sourced dairy products, and their coffee grounds were headed to a local farm for composting.

While the SCAA can’t really dictate that all vendors have booths this green, it would go a long way if they could discourage the use of disposable cups — such as giving out small glasses to registered attendees. I’ve been to conferences where everyone received a coffee mug, and that’s what people used on the coffee breaks. At SCAA, the multiple coffee break stations should certainly have used ceramic mugs rather than paper cups.

Another way the could have cut down on waste might be in the printing of the four-page color newsprint newsletter published daily at the show. There was some useful content in it, but they were discarded all over the place. Could they have sent a copy to everybody via email and/or made them available for printing at print stations instead? There was no indication that the paper it was printed on was recycled, either.

Everybody at the expo got a swag bag — a  burlap tote that had some literature and a few samples of odds and ends. I saw a lot of the innards, particularly the paper stuff, discarded. A literature table might make more sense and be less wasteful, as people could pick up what they were interested in. The bags themselves were stiff and scratchy. Since they were presumably supposed to look like jute coffee sacks, seems like it would have been a cool idea to recycle real coffee sacks, which are a pain in the butt to get rid of, according to roasters I’ve talked to. Personally, I wasn’t that crazy about the bag. However, one of my cats immediately claimed it, maneuvered it in front of the heat vent, and it’s now one of her favorite places to sit. She loves it.

I’ll be the first to admit I have no experience planning a trade show, but the paper waste alone at this expo made me cringe. I think SCAA could have done a lot more to make the event much greener.

C&C hits the SCAA expo

Once again C&C will be at the SCAA‘s Annual Exposition. This year it takes place in Atlanta on April 16 to 19. I’ll be there along with my husband Darrin, permanent member of the C&C tasting panel, fellow coffee farm explorer, and all-around partner in crime. We’ll once again report on news and events related to sustainable coffee, such as the Rainforest Alliance Cupping for Quality award winners, SCAA’s sustainability award, and related lectures such as the one on coffee and climate change. The featured portrait country this year is Nicaragua. We have a lot of thoughts and comments after our recent trip there, and we’re holding off on posting them so we can put them in context after we’ve attended several programs on coffee in Nicaragua.

Nicaragua's Finca El Jaguar in the news

On my recent trip to Nicaragua, I was fortunate to have a chance to meet Lili and Georges Duriaux-ChavarrÁ­a, owners of Finca El Jaguar, a forest reserve and shade coffee farm in Jinotega. They were completely charming, and I was impressed with their devotion to bird conservation. We weren't able to visit Finca El Jaguar this time, but definitely plan to do some bird banding there on our next trip.

Eco-Index, an online compilation of Neotropical conservation projects provided by Rainforest Alliance, has a really nice interview with Georges which describes their work with sustainable coffee, community, and conservation. Please check it out. 

I've reviewed their organic, Rainforest Alliance certified coffee, which is available from Allegro Coffee Roasters at Whole Foods. Great coffee from great people and a great place. You can't beat that.

Green Mountain climate change grant finalists

Last month, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters announced a request for proposals for four $200,000 grants to organizations working on climate change. The grants will be awarded in each of four categories: transportation-related emissions, threats to coffee-growing communities, building political will, and empowering individual action.

They’ve just announced the finalists in each category. While I’m disappointed that a proposal by the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center (developers of the Bird-Friendly shade coffee criteria) didn’t make the cut, I see that another great organization did. The American Bird Conservancy is one of five finalists in the Threats to Coffee Growing Communities category. Here is a summary of their proposal:

[We] will determine the additional carbon load held by shade coffee plantations over sun coffee plantations, and calculate the income differential per acre for coffee production for shade and sun  growers. We will then test a system to stream carbon offsets credit funding incentives to shade growers to compensate for the difference in income between the two systems. If it can be shown that shade coffee can be economically beneficial due to its additional carbon load (from both a sale of credits and/or consumer interest), then this project stands to benefit farmers across millions of acres of the Andes and could be the land management driver that saves the Cerulean Warbler the fastest declining songbird in North America on its wintering grounds. The project will have multiple additional benefits for famers and local communities in terms of the protection of watersheds and traditional farming techniques which are currently threatened by conversion to sun coffee.

ABC does excellent bird conservation work at home and internationally, and does so very cost-efficiently. They are very familiar with Latin American shade coffee issues. I’ve written about their Cerulean Warbler campaign, which has included working with Colombian partners and shade coffee farmers to preserve wintering habitat for this declining songbird. ABC has continued to work on reforestation projects in South America which includes shade coffee farms. I’ve also written about the potential for coffee farms to provide carbon sequestration services, and think the ABC proposal is very worthy of support.

For the next week, the public can vote for and comment on proposals at JustMeans.

My year in beans: Winners, losers, and the future

In a previous post I mentioned that I had kept track of all the coffee I had in 2008. That post emphasized the low price ($2.70 a day) of drinking only really good, sustainable, specialty coffee.

Here, I’d like to make some brief comments on a few of the coffees themselves.

As I noted, my 2008 list included 63 different coffees, nearly all single origin  coffees, from 22 countries. Most were Latin American, with El Salvador leading the pack; Kenya topped the choices from the rest of the world. I drank coffee from 23 roasters, turning most often to Counter Culture and Terroir Coffee Company.

My three favorite coffees were:

  • Mamuto, Terroir Coffee Company, Kenya. Coffee Review gave this coffee an amazing 97 points, deservedly so.
  • Finca Kilimanjaro, PT’s Coffee Company (I mentioned roaster and coffee here). A Kenyan bean grown in El Salvador, literally the best of both worlds.
  • Finca Nueva Armenia, Counter Culture, Guatemala. From a Smithsonian Bird-Friendly certified farm, it has to be the current best certified sustainable coffee in the world (my review here).

One disappointing coffee stood out: Trader Joe’s Cafe Feminino Peru. I’ve tried these beans from this source before, as they are widely available; my brief review from Grounds for Change was very positive. The Trader Joe’s version, which was supposed to be a medium roast, was very dark and oily, more like a French roast. That shouldn’t be a problem — I liked the Grounds for Change in a dark roast. Yet I found the Trader Joe’s was awful: thin, harsh, and sooty. Trader Joe’s doesn’t use roast dates, and the (lack of) bloom indicated this batch was not particularly fresh. I will be devoting a post to Trader Joe’s coffee in the future.

A few of you may be wondering why, if I drink so many different coffees, so few are reviewed here on Coffee & Conservation (eleven reviews were published in 2008). There are several reasons. First, although I’ll occasionally give just my own opinion on a coffee, fair reviews involve a bunch of people tasting each coffee, often more than once. Sometimes, it’s just hard to corral a panel. Second, as I pointed out in the introduction to how we do reviews, most coffee ratings are lumped in the middle of the 1 to 5 motmot range. The value in the reviews is the background information provided about the origin/region, farm, growing methods, and roaster. This research is time-consuming. Sometimes, I don’t come up with enough solid information to make a good review.

In 2009, reviews will focus on sustainability stars and outstanding coffees, as well as more reviews of the coffee of popular retailers, such as I’ve done with Panera, Einstein Bros, or Tim Hortons.  Starbucks and Caribou will also get more attention since they are how many people are introduced to “specialty” coffee. In many ways, these are more difficult to write…the more corporate the company, the less they divulge about their sources.

As always, if you have any suggestions or things you’d like to see, please drop me a line (contact info here).

Coffee bag photo by Biskuit.

My year in beans 2008: The cost of coffee

At the beginning of 2008, I started keeping track of all the coffee I purchased. Since I drink (and share) a lot of coffee — all specialty coffee and some quite expensive — I was curious how many kinds I went through in a year and what I spent.

After a year of enjoying a wide variety of beans, my final tally really surprised me — especially how little it cost to truly enjoy this great beverage.

The cost of all the coffee I drank in 2008, including shipping charges and the retail price of some coffee that I was given free, was $987.03. Not a small piece of change, but it works out to a piddling $2.70 a day. Every day, that’s a full pot for my husband and I. Two or three times a week I make a French press in the afternoon. Once a month or more, I share coffee at work with a group to do coffee reviews (or just hang out). I give away a half-dozen bags or so in a year. A lot of indulgence for less than $3 a day!

How much indulgence? My list consisted of 63 different coffees — only two were blends, the rest were single origin coffees. I had around a dozen selections more than once. Some I just liked so much I bought them again. Sometimes I tried the same coffee by two different roasters, or the same coffee but different crops. The coffees came from 22 countries and from 23 roasters.

Unfortunately, I kept track by order and not by bag, so I can’t tell you what the cheapest and most expensive coffees were. Most were 12-oz. bags, and I don’t think I paid less than $8 for a bag. I paid over $20 fairly often, with the most expensive about $35. Because I didn’t keep track of each bag, I am also unable to calculate a price per cup using the nifty tool that I provided here earlier this year. I’ve already set up the 2009 spreadsheet to include these variable so I can provide more detail next year.

I think this is insanely cheap for what can be one of life’s most satisfying daily luxuries. If you drink less coffee than we do, have a good roaster nearby and can avoid shipping costs, or splurge less often on really expensive beans, you’ll spend much less. If you still think it’s too expensive to drink only decent, sustainably-grown coffee, then you are probably only drinking it for the kick. Try NoDoz, and you won’t be destroying the environment and impoverishing farmers for your caffeine fix.

Half cup photo by MissBeckles.

The Coffee Conference

My husband and I attended the Coffee Conference at Miami University in Oxford, OH. I’ve now been to meetings that covered coffee from every angle: ecological (ornithological conferences), trade (SCAA annual meeting) and now the academic and scholarly. This event had a wide range of speakers on a variety of topics. The audience was also varied. As far as I could tell, there were perhaps 75 registered participants, including small roasters, academics from many disciplines (history, economics, literature), and representatives from producing countries and NGOs. Many Miami U. students also attended.

I will be following up with a more detailed post on what for me was the most interesting message I came away with: the fairly uniform negative attitudes toward certification agencies, ranging from distrust to disgust. Right now, I’ll just try to burnish my own legitimacy by doing some name dropping and showing you photos of famous coffee people.

Geoff Watts, left, of Intelligentsia gave a talk about Direct Trade relationships. In his discussion, Geoff noted that environmental sustainability has to be part of what is fostered and encouraged in direct relationships with farmers. He said that although a farm might be producing great coffee, if the land isn’t taken care of then it cannot continue to produce the same quality coffee over the years. Ecological integrity is part of the equation.

Geoff also offered a lot of the kind of insightful commentary on other talks, especially regarding Fair Trade, that only someone who has been intimately involved with producers can provide.

Ken Davids gave a great talk on interpreting the iconography and images of coffee through time. He grouped them by theme, such as the 1950s “Good Cuppa Joe” — coffee as every man’s luxury — or the “Safari in a Cup” adventure at exotic origins symbolism of the early specialty coffee movement. If  Ken hadn’t noted that his early background was as a novelist and college writing teacher, I would have guessed it by his presentation. It was creative, clever, and reminded me of the kind of deep interpretation of literature that I recall from my undergrad days. Very enjoyable — and I can’t imagine seeing a talk like this at any other kind of coffee conference.

At dinner, George Howell (center in front of laptop) showed off his new Extract MoJo software to Geoff Watts of Intelligentsia, David Waldman of Rojo’s Roastery in New Jersey, and yours truly.  Just listening to coffee guys talk about coffee was quite a learning experience. I was glad that I could keep up with a lot of it, and that I was able to make some contributions from a consumer and ecological viewpoint.

George and I, in fact, had several great talks about some of the pros, cons, and the future of various certifications, and he was very gracious about answering my questions. He gave a really lively presentation on the many points from crop to cup where quality can fall off. I was once again amazed that we ever end up with a decent cup of coffee, much less brilliantly delicious cups. And also again, I am sure that if more people know the many steps involved in bringing this crop to market, and the intense labor that goes into it, that they’d be willing to pay a lot more for it. As they should.

I asked Hacienda La Esmeralda’s Price Peterson some coffee-growing advice. I brought home some beans from Panama last winter, and have five little plants growing right now. A couple of them are looking a little anemic. Price was a bit stumped and was not sure exactly what to recommend. The guy can grow some of the most lauded and expensive coffee in the world, but didn’t know what to tell me about some mundane Caturra growing under lights at 193 meters in Michigan.

It was a really great conference, and all the other participants I talked to agreed. The small size allowed for a lot of interaction and discussion. Its interdisciplinary nature, and the varied backgrounds of participants made for a wide range of opinions as well more balance. There is a plan for a book derived from the proceedings which I look forward to. Kudos to the organizers, especially Robert Thurston. I’ll be incorporating more information from the conference into future posts, especially regarding the backlash against certifications.

Vietnam: Will replacing old coffee mean more deforestation?

A news report states that half of Vietnam’s coffee trees will have to be replaced in the next 5 to 10 years:

According to the Vietnam Coffee — Cocoa Association, the current 500,000ha of coffee comprises three kinds.

The first is coffee planted prior to 1988, totaling 86,400ha, accounting for 17.3% of the total area. These coffee trees are very old and need to be replaced.

The second is trees grown from 1988 to 1993 on 139,600ha, making up 27.9%. Many trees are growing old and their productivity is declining.

The third kind is trees planted after 1993, with around 274,000ha or 54.8%. These trees are yielding high productivity. In the next few years, Vietnam’s coffee output will depend on this section of coffee.

The article notes that despite warnings from experts and bank loan restrictions, farmers have planted more and more coffee, destroying forest to do so. This is almost all low-quality robusta sold to multinational roasters for grocery store blends.

Vietnamese agricultural authorities have tried to increase quality and discourage poor farming practices, without much success. This article again notes the recommendation to “put an end to the habit of  selling low-quality coffee in the international market” in an effort to move toward sustainability.

This can’t happen as long as the demand from multinationals — in other words, from consumers — remains high. Poor farmers will continue to clear land to plant more coffee. The resulting glut in supply 4 years down the road causes prices to plummet. Multinationals snap up the cheap beans. The cycle of poverty and deforestation continues.

Don’t contribute to this madness. Stop buying cheap, mass-produced coffee.

Update, May 2015: In Vietnam, “Deforestation, monocropping and intensive pesticide use that helped create the boom now leaves coffee farms more vulnerable to climate change,” reports an article in The Guardian outlining the disastrous effects of drought on coffee in the country.

Related posts:

Rainforest Alliance partners with the Coffee Quality Institute

A Problem
Judging by the enormous market shares of the Big Four corporate coffee multinationals, a lot of people don’t mind drinking lousy tasting coffee. However, plenty of people won’t do it. But more imporantly, if it doesn’t taste better, a lot of folks are not going to pay extra for certified coffee, and these coffees nearly always carry a premium. I’m not even willing to fork over more cash just for an eco-friendly label if the coffee is mediocre. If I can’t drink tasty, sustainable coffee, I just don’t drink it — although I’m as addicted as the next person. Unfortunately, I’m an exception.

Here’s the nasty truth: Even people who profess to caring about the environment tend to default to habitat-destroying, cheap coffee produced with tons of chemicals if there isn’t sufficient motivation to switch.  If they try a certified coffee and it doesn’t taste any better than the stuff they’ve been drinking, they don’t bother to buy it again.

A Partnership
That’s why it’s good news that the fastest growing and most familiar eco-labeller, Rainforest Alliance (RA), has inked an agreement with the non-profit Coffee Quality Institute (CQI). Among other things, this partnership will integrate CQI’s standardized coffee quality standards into RA’s tracking and traceability software and promote those standards within RA’s sustainable agriculture program. On a practical level, it means coffee buyers (importers, roasters, and consumers) will have some objective benchmark (the Q coffee score) indicating the quality of the coffee, as well as the flavor profile.

For the last five years, RA has had annual Cupping for Quality events and cupping competitions organized by CQI. These events and awards really help highlight the fact that sustainably-grown coffees can have amazing flavor, worthy of purchasing just for their taste alone. This partnership should really help buyer awareness and enhance interest in the quality of sustainable coffee.

A Conundrum
I’m not sure how RA will reconcile this commitment to quality — with an emphasis in this case on taste — with their partnerships with big corporate roasters like Kraft. Kraft’s Yuban coffee is 30% RA certified, and has been described by Ken Davids, one of the most respected coffee evaluators in the world, as “Cloyingly sweet, earthy/mildewed character with very distinct grassy notes.” This same review says that those who should drink Yuban are “on a budget with a commitment to organic growing principles that transcends the desire to drink decent coffee.” One could argue that the high-quality RA certified beans are being overwhelmed by the remaining 70%, mildewy, grassy, earthy, who-knows-where-they-come-from beans. But that certainly defeats the purpose. This odd dichotomy — fine work in environmentally and socially sustainable, high quality coffee, alongside helping corporate giants buff their green image by permitting their seal on products containing as little as 30% certified beans — produces not a small amount of cognitive dissonance among coffee lovers, myself included. This will eventually be the subject of its own post.

SCAA flavor wheel photo by AndyCiordia under a Creative Commons license.

"Best of" the SCAA conference

I have a lot to report on sustainability and certification issues from the SCAA conference, but it will be doled out over the coming weeks. Here, I thought I’d like to give some quick impressions of some of the most notable things we encountered.

Best origin booth: Guatemala. Many origins had booths, most with green or brewed coffee samples and lots of literature. The biggest, most colorful, and most informative was, hands down, Guatemala’s. The display really focused on the fact that nearly all of their coffee is shade grown, and preserves biodiversity and birds. This information is duplicated in a terrific book available at the display called The Green Book. Here are a couple of the display panels.


Best tag line: “Don’t take coffee from strangers” — Crop to Cup. That sums up a piece of advice every consumer should take to heart. Crop to Cup Coffee Company is a small coffee roaster with really direct relationships with farmers; on their web site you get very thorough information.

Coolest people I finally got to meet: Peter Giuliano and Kim Elena Bullock from Counter Culture Coffee. I’ve had so many good conversations and learned so much from the folks at CCC, it was a great pleasure to finally meet Peter and Kim in person.

Best coffee I tried: Mystery Coffee #103 from the Roaster’s Guild Coffee of the Year competition. Yesterday alone, I tried at least 20 coffees. And I don’t mean tasting and spitting out, I mean drinking. I can’t say I really recommend this strategy (I ended up both overtired and jittery), but it was interesting! The coffee I liked the best, as far as one I would like to drink daily, was #103 at the coffee of the year competition. Conference attendees got to sample and vote on the top ten finalists.

With all this coffee, perhaps this category deserves a couple of subcategories.

Best Coffee I Tasted Made on a Clover: Intelligentsia’s Organic Anjilanaka, Bolivia. There were three Clover coffee brewers at the show, and we tried coffees made on all of them.

Best espresso shot: Finca Vista Hermosa at the Barista Guild’s booth. Light roast and crazy citrus zing made this not your usual espresso.

Most interesting thing that I didn’t think I’d care about: U.S. Barista Championships. Once you started watching baristas compete, it was kind of addictive. Beats watching a poker championship. This is Belle Batista of Aldo Coffee, the Mid-Atlantic Regional winner. She didn’t make the finals.

Best non-coffee product name: Two Leaves and a Bud. I used to be an avid tea drinker.

Best authentic character: Wicha Promyong, Doi Chaang Coffee (which we reviewed here). After posing for the shot, he whipped out a nice business card and spoke perfect English!

There will be more forthcoming on what I learned in the sustainability and agroecology lectures, additional sustainability and other awards, and more. It has been a great experience.