Retail and specialty roasters

Starbucks to discontinue Organic Shade Grown Mexico

Late last month, Starbucks announced they will be offering four “Blonde” roast coffees beginning in January 2012. This comes after many years of complaints from consumers that the company roasted all their beans too dark, hence the often-heard “Charbucks” moniker.  The lighter roasts will be two new regular coffees, Starbucks Veranda Blend (using Latin American beans) and Starbucks Willow Blend (Latin America and East Africa), a decaf (Decaf Starbucks Willow Blend), and an instant (Starbucks VIA Ready Brew Veranda Blend).

Rumor has it that four of their current offerings will be replaced by the new coffees. They are the Fair Trade certified Café Estima Blend, the decaf Café Verona, the decaf House Blend, and the Organic Shade Grown Mexico. In response to my specific inquiry, I have confirmation from Starbucks that the latter will indeed be discontinued.

We reviewed the Organic Shade Grown Mexico here awhile back, and provided a lot of background information. In a nutshell, this coffee was sourced from farmers in Chiapas in the buffer zone of the El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve. The sourcing of coffee from this area was done in partnership with Conservation International, and lead to the development of Starbucks’ green coffee sourcing standards program, known as CAFE [Coffee and Farm Equity] Practices. The Starbucks/Conservation International partnership began in 1998, continued for years with substantial reinvestments by Starbucks, being known as the Conservation Coffee program.

Starbucks just recently renewed the partnership for two years and $3 million, with a focus on climate change. The renewal will mark the beginning of work in Brazil, and expand on programs in Sumatra and Chiapas. However, I was unable to get a direct answer from Starbucks on whether or not they will still be providing an organic, shade-grown Mexico coffee as a seasonal offering, whether it will be used in one of the new Blonde blends, or in some other blend.

With the advent of the Conservation International partnership and the development of their CAFE Practices, Starbucks imposed quality standards on the Chiapas cooperatives supplying  this coffee. While it supplied significant benefits to the co-ops initially, many objected to the requirements and quit selling some or all of their coffee to Starbucks once their own capacity and abilities improved. These included CESMACH (Ecological Farmers of the Sierra Madres of Chiapas), Organizacion de Productores Cafetaleros de Ángel Albino Corzo (OPCAAC), Finca Triunfo Verde Sociedad Civil, and Organizacion Regional de Productores Agroecologicos (ORPAE). At least one source [1] indicates that many of the suppliers to Starbucks in this area of Chiapas are small producers that do not belong to cooperatives. Perhaps there is not enough volume to support a quasi-single-origin coffee from this region any longer.

In any event, the Blonde roast roll out will coincide with an overhaul of coffee packaging/branding at Starbucks to emphasize the three roast levels (with the lightest being Blonde, which is still roasted to second crack) rather than origin, and that may also play a role in the discontinuation of this coffee.

I have generally recommended the Organic Shade Grown Mexico to friends who are Starbucks customers looking for their most eco-friendly offering.  While I generally believe that the Starbucks CAFE Practices environmental standards, which apply to nearly all their coffees, are quite strong and relevant, I’ll have to reassess to come up with a specific recommendation once the Mexico disappears from shelves.

Renard, M.-C. 2010. In the name of conservation: CAFE Practices and Fair Trade in Mexico. Journal of Business Ethics 92:287-299.

Sips: Starbucks news

Some recent news from/about the Mermaid.

  • Starbucks plans to develop its own coffee farm in Yunnan, China. A move I think is (relatively speaking) good news for the environment there. In my post on coffee growing in China, I noted deforestation and high chemical use are problems with coffee growing in China, which is dominated by Nestlé for instant coffee. I also mentioned that Starbucks used Yunnan-grown arabica in one of their local coffees; the quality was not up to snuff for a single-origin offering and it had to be used in a blend (“South of the Clouds”).  Starbucks wants to increase quality, and will be training farmers and will establish a farmers’ support center, (its third globally, others are in Costa Rica and Rwanda). The growing operation will no doubt have meet the standards of the rest of their suppliers, which include very good environmental criteria. This has to be an improvement over what I believe is the norm for coffee growing in China.
  • First, Starbucks announced it was terminating its partnership with Kraft, which has distributed The Mermaid’s coffee to grocery stores since 1998. Kraft was unhappy. This sparked speculation that Starbucks might want to expand in the single-cup market (currently the closest it comes is with its Via instant coffee). Green Mountain Coffee Roasters was the presumed partner, since the main alternative is Kraft’s Tassimo brand. Then Starbucks announced it would launch its own single-brewer. Stay tuned.
  • GreenBiz.com had a nice article on Starbucks’ green buildings initiative, featuring LEED-certified buildings, including a roasting facility and all new retail stores. More at the Starbucks web site.

Starbucks CAFE Practices

I have provided information on the five major certifications applied to coffee: organic, Fair Trade, Smithsonian Bird-Friendly, Rainforest Alliance, and Utz Certified.

Starbucks does sell certified organic and Fair Trade coffees. You can see how much coffee they (and other major companies) purchase and how much is eco-certified in this data table, which is kept updated.

Starbucks also has its own green coffee sourcing standard, known as CAFE (Coffee and Farm Equity) Practices.  It was developed in partnership with the non-profit environmental group Conservation International and SCS Global Services. (SCS), an independent evaluation and verification company. The CAFE Practices program covers four categories. Two, product quality and economic accountability, are criteria that are required by all Starbucks suppliers. The other two categories are social responsibility and environmental leadership. I’ll focus on the environmental criteria.

How it works

Like some other certifications, CAFE Practices operates on a point system. The social responsibility and environmental leadership categories are divided into sections. A least 60% of possible points are needed for preferred supplier status, and 80% for strategic supplier status. These suppliers get enhanced pricing and contract terms. [Update: the average score was 80%, and 60% of supplies were preferred or strategic; these data were for all new and renewing farms in the year 2012.]

A point is awarded for compliance with individual “indicators.” In the current version, there are 185 total indicators for large suppliers (greater than 12 ha) and 124 for smallholders, including those who are part of a cooperative.

In the section “Coffee Growing — Environmental Leadership” 45 points are possible (42 for smallholders).  Many of the individual indicators are actually multiple variations on the same criteria; only one of them can be counted for a point. For instance, the indicators dealing with organic mulch award a point for either 25% of the production area being covered by organic matter, 50%, or 100% — three indicators but only one point possible.

What kinds of environmental criteria are included?

The “Coffee Growing — Environmental Leadership” section covers water body protection, including criteria for width and type of vegetated buffer zones along permanent and seasonal water bodies, and use of chemicals or waste storage near water bodies; protection of soil resources, including measures to control and prevent erosion and use of organic mulches and cover crops; conserving biodiversity, including maintaining a shade canopy, protecting wildlife, and establishment of conservation areas; and environmental management, including pest and disease control.

There is an additional section that deals with environmental issues having to do with coffee processing, specific to either wet processing or dry processing, which includes indicators on water conservation, waste management, and energy use.

A closer look at Conserving Biodiversity

This particular subsection has three indicators that are mandatory: 1) native trees are only removed if they are a hazard to people or “significantly” compete with coffee plants, 2) hunting or commercial collecting of flora or fauna is prohibited, and 3) no conversion of natural forest to agricultural production.

Indicators specific to maintaining shade cover include percent cover, canopy tree diversity and native species benchmarks, and preservation of epiphytes and vines.

How does this stack up?

The Starbucks CAFE Practices environmental criteria address many more relevant ecological issues than either Fair Trade certification standards or UTZ Certified Good Inside standards. Although there is some lack of specificity (e.g., what constitutes native trees being in “significant” competition with coffee plants?), they are far less generic and more comprehensive than Fair Trade or UTZ standards. While the large number of indicators from which to garner points seems to make it easy for suppliers to attain favored status, I think that their division into sections and subsections covering a wide range of ecological issues is more valuable and should result in more eco-friendly farms than fewer, weaker, or more vague “requirements.”

To compare Starbucks CAFE Practices environmental criteria with those of Rainforest Alliance would probably take sitting down and mock-scoring some imaginary farms. I suspect that a farm meeting Rainforest Alliance’s minimum environmental standards would turn out to be using more sustainable growing methods than the typical Starbucks preferred supplier — although a lack of standardization among the standards might make that assessment difficult (Rainforest Alliance uses 99 criteria in 10 principals, with percentage thresholds for certification). It also wouldn’t surprise me that a Starbucks strategic supplier that scored highly in the Environmental Leadership sections could beat out a Rainforest Alliance-certified farm.

Because the Smithsonian Bird-Friendly biodiversity criteria are so well-developed and targeted, and since their certification also requires organic certification, their environmental standards are the strongest.

Overall, I’m generally impressed with the scope and level of detail of Starbucks CAFE Practices environmental standards, and find them superior to those of some highly-regarded certifications.

Criticisms and more resources

There have been accusations that the reality on the ground with some Starbucks suppliers is inconsistent with CAFE Practices standards. In some cases at least, that is true, but it is also true with other certifications; Starbucks tends to receive a lot of scrutiny. Third party verification systems are subject to the same corruption and deceit whether they are certifying organic products or Starbucks coffee. There are plenty of places where compliance can break down, and that’s the topic of a separate investigation.

To examine all of the Starbucks CAFE Practices criteria yourself, download the standards documents which are available online at the SCS web site. You can also download current and past Global Responsibility reports at the Starbucks website.

Updates:

  • This post discusses how the CAFE Practices program is assessed and its impacts.
  • In May 2015, I wrote an overview and update on Starbucks CAFE Practices for Daily Coffee News — read it here.
  • Starbucks has initiated other coffee sustainability projects, including farmer support centers, tree planting, coffee community support of several kinds, farmer loans, and co-founding the Sustainable Coffee Initiative. A summary about these efforts is at their website.

Starbucks coffee cup by Rudolf Schuba under a Creative Commons license.

GoCoffeeGo

One of the highlights of my week is visiting the web sites of my favorite responsible coffee roasters and exploring what new sustainably-grown beans are available for me to try. For those of you who are not as thrilled with the shopping process, there is GoCoffeeGo.

GoCoffeeGo is a web site that brings together offerings from a variety of specialty coffee roasters across the U.S. Most of them are roasters that carry several varieties of sustainably-grown beans (often certified), provide details on origin, and freqently have direct relationships with producers — all criteria I use to define “responsible roasters.” In fact, many of the roasters are on my list and a number of their coffees have been reviewed here.

Most of the same selections available on the web sites of individual roasters are also available at GoCoffeeGo, at the same price. Orders are drop shipped, so there is no more delay between roasting and arrival than there would be if you had ordered directly from the roaster. Besides bringing together all these great coffees at no mark-up, GoCoffeeGo offers weekly specials that are not offered by the roasters — discounts, free shipping, etc.

Having gathered these specialty roasters, GoCoffeeGo enables visitors to search for beans in many different categories, the relevant ones for us being organic, Rainforest Alliance, shade grown, and sustainable. A word about these categories.

Certified coffees are produced under particular conditions. The categories “organic” and “Rainforest Alliance” both represent certifications, and you can read about their certification requirements in my quick guide to coffee certifications.

Things are a little murkier for the categories “shade grown” and “sustainable.” There isn’t a legal definition for either, leaving it up to producers, importers, exporters, roasters, and/or retailers to decide if their product fits those categories, by their own definitions. There are a host of problems with that, as I outlined in “Who evaluates non-certified coffee?” parts one and two. (I use these terms all the time myself; I define shade according to this shade management diagram, and the definition I use for “sustainable coffee” is in a box on the User Guide page.)

So you still might need to do a little homework when buying your beans (you can use my top 5 indicators of sustainable coffee for some help), but GoCoffeeGo has done a lot of the legwork for you. There are plenty of other search tools, ratings, and recommendations on the site to further ease your journey.

Caribou Coffee: All Rainforest Alliance by 2011

Caribou Coffee recently announced that it will be sourcing all of its beans from Rainforest Alliance certified farms by the end of 2011.

Caribou has been working towards this goal since mid-2006. Many of its coffees contain varying levels of Rainforest Alliance certified beans; Rainforest Alliance allows use of their seal on packages containing a minimum of 30% certified beans, so long as the percentage is displayed on the seal. That made me wonder if this announcement meant that every variety of coffee at Caribou would have RA-certified beans, or that every variety would consist of 100% RA-certified beans.

At the recent Specialty Coffee Association of America (SCAA) event, I verified that every variety of coffee at Caribou would consist of 100% RA-certified beans. This certification doesn’t necessarily mean it is shade-grown coffee, but meets a variety of environmental and social criteria.

Caribou Coffee is the second largest coffeeshop operation, behind Starbucks, with over 530 stores in 16 states as well as outside the U.S. It currently has seven varieties which are 100%  RA-certified: Colombia TimanÁ¡ (my personal favorite), Guatemala El ParaÁ­so, Sumatra Samosir Batak, La Minita Peaberry, Costa Rica Sombra del Poro, Lacuna (a blend of Guatemala, El Salvador and Ethiopia), and Lakeshore Blend (Guatemala, Costa Rica and Ethiopia). Including other coffee offerings which are at least 30% RA-certified, Caribou currently sources about 17 million pounds of coffee a year from RA-certified farms.

Starbucks news

Some recent sustainability-related news regarding Starbucks:

  • Starbucks has a new Conservation International-branded loyalty card. Every time a customer uses a CI Starbucks card from now through the end of 2010, five cents will go to Conservation International for forest preservation. Starbucks cards are re-loadable cards used for purchases at their stores; registered cards earn rewards. These cards are only available in U.S. stores, but I presume that, like other cards, can be used at any store worldwide.Conservation International has been partnered with Starbucks for over a decade. They worked together to develop Starbucks’ Coffee and Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E.) Practices coffee sourcing guidelines and created a funding mechanism to address climate change in coffee growing regions. You can read more about their project that led to Starbucks Organic Shade Grown Mexico coffee variety here. CI’s Charity Navigator profile here.
  • Starbucks has become a sponsor of the Betacup challenge, which is looking for a way to reduce the waste from the 58 million paper coffee cups that are thrown away annually. The company will furnish the $20,000 of prize money. Small potatoes for Starbucks, but they have their own cup-related initiatives (see below) and cups are not a huge part of the company’s environmental footprint. Starbucks has already committed to making all of its cups recyclable or reusable in the next five years (including their plastic beverage cups), part of a suite of sustainability issues in their Shared Planet program. After all, it’s up to the consumer to reuse, recycle, or bring their own mug.
  • A Starbucks store in France won a sustainable retail design award. This store was the first international store that went for LEED-certification, indicating building sustainability. The company plans to have all its new stores LEED-certified. It also has a LEED-certified roasting facility, and the Starbucks headquarters in Seattle is the oldest and largest building to get LEED certification.

Starbucks cup photo by Josh Semans under a Creative Commons License.

Certified Bird-Friendly coffee

I have a rotating list of recommended coffee roasters and retailers at the bottom of this page. They are all sources of sustainably-grown coffee, with online ordering available. These roasters have been chosen based on criteria which I’ve outlined in this post. Many of them carry certified organic, Rainforest Alliance, or Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center (SMBC) Bird-Friendly® (BF) coffee, some do not. There are many reasons why coffee from farms with excellent environmental practices are not certified, and why many coffee roasters cannot afford to carry only certified coffees.

However, I understand some consumers prefer to buy only certified coffee. SMBC has the strongest shade/biodiversity criteria by far, so I have compiled this list of online sources of Bird Friendly® (BF)-certified coffee. I tried to find sources that regularly offered at least two varieties of BF-certified coffee, but remember that coffee is seasonal and there are not many certified farms, so availability may fluctuate. Be sure to check that the offering says it is BF-certified.

You can search for a retailer on the SMBC web site, and you can also verify that the source/farm listed is really a BF-certified farm with a look-up on the SMBC web site.

Very special promo on Counter Culture Holiday Blend 2009

My holiday fundraiser for the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center

One of my favorite coffees is Counter Culture’s Finca Nueva Armenia from Guatemala’s Huehuetenango region. We reviewed it in November 2008. Here are some quick facts about this coffee:

  • Although it is not marketed as such by Counter Culture, this is a certified Bird-Friendly farm, meeting the highest shade and biodiversity standards available for coffee. You can verify this status at the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center (SMBC) web site; just click on “Guatemala.”
  • It’s certified organic (this is also a requirement for Bird-Friendly certification).
  • As a family-owned farm, Finca Nueva Armenia doesn’t qualify for Fair Trade certification, which only covers small farmers that are part of a cooperative. However, this coffee is Counter Culture Direct Trade Certified, in which Counter Culture pays a minimum price that is well above the Fair Trade floor price, plus quality incentives. Price and other aspects of the program are certified by a third party.

Finca Nueva Armenia has remained consistently delicious the last several crop years. So I was thrilled to find out that Counter Culture has decided to use this coffee as their 2009 Holiday Blend. As they have done in the past, Counter Culture’s “blend” is not composed of coffees from different origins, but a single origin roasted using a European technique called Vienna MÁ©lange, in which different roasts are mixed and blended. You can read more about this technique here.

This year, for each bag of Holiday Blend sold, Counter Culture will be donating $1 to a native tree-planting project. Acting on a suggestion by the SMBC, the Recinos, owners of Finca Nueva Armenia, want to incorporate more fruit-bearing and canopy trees in the coffee production areas. These funds will help cover costs of collecting seeds from native trees, raising them in their nursery, and planting and tending them. So far, they have 7500 seedlings.

I want you to support this tree-planting effort; support the Recinos family’s commitment to growing organic, shade-grown, Bird-Friendly coffee; and I want you to try this fine sustainably-grown and sourced coffee.

For every bag of the Finca Nueva Armenia Holiday Blend purchased by a Coffee & Conservation reader from now through December 21, 2009,  I will donate $1 to the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center*.

The Holiday Blend is $11.75 for a 12-ounce bag. That’s $0.65 for a cup of great coffee. Counter Culture is now offering a $3 flat rate shipping for all orders — so even if you only order a single bag, it is still only $0.82 a cup (calculate it here yourself).

Order it here, and put your money — and mine, and Counter Culture’s — where our hearts are: in support of a great future for great coffee and the birds and biodiversity that depend on it.

UPDATE: I rounded up and contributed $50 to SMBC…I wish more people had cooperated, and am up for ideas on how to run a similar promotion next year.

*The Fine Print. Send me a copy of your order via email (coffeehabitat AT gmail.com). I’ll just note how many bags of the Holiday Blend you purchased so I can keep track, then I’ll delete it. It does not contain your credit card information (but feel free to strip out the payment section if you like) and I won’t save any of your personal information. I am a modestly-compensated ecologist, so I’ll have to cap this at $250, but feel free to make me fork over every penny. Does anybody care to join me in this effort with a match in part or whole? Send me an email!  This promotion was entirely my idea, and I am not receiving any compensation for this promotion from Counter Culture.

Cafe Femenino now at Kroger

By now, Café Femenino coffee should be available in many Kroger grocery stores across the nation.

Café Femenino was founded in 2004 by Organic Products Trading Company (OPTCO, the exclusive importer of this coffee) and several other groups to organize and unite female producers in Peru. The project is now active in Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, and the Dominican Republic. Women are active in all aspects of coffee production, must be on the title of the land, receive extensive training and support and a premium above the established Fair Trade price.

Kroger will be carrying a Café Femenino coffee roasted by BuyWell Fair Trade Coffee: Peru Alta Gold, an organic dark roast produced by 743 women of the CECANOR cooperative in the Penachi region of Peru. (Click here for our review of several BuyWell coffees.) While at the SCAA conference last spring,I spoke with OPTCO’s founders Gay and Garth Smith. I asked which of their Café Femenino countries had the best and most diverse shade, and Peru was the answer.

At the same time, I also attended a screening of a documentary on Café Femenino, Strong Coffee. This was an extremely powerful film about an equally powerful life- and community-changing project.Café Femenino is one of the most worthwhile and transformative projects in coffee today. Kudos to Kroger for making it so widely and easily available.

The sincerest form of flattery

Last year, Counter Culture Coffee launched its Direct Trade program. They also started rolling out their current line of packaging: brown kraft-like valve bags with a sleeve that has nice origin-appropriate art, a map on one side panel showing the source, tasting notes on the other side, and a good description of the farm or co-op on the back. I believe they won an award at a coffee trade show for this labeling.

This year, Starbucks debuted “seasonal coffees.” These coffees are only available for a limited time, and are “harvested in-season when they are at their peak of flavor.”  I’m not sure what Starbucks is really trying to say, since all coffee is harvested “in season.”  Coffee is at its peak flavor when it is fresh — when the green beans have not been sitting around for ages, and when it is freshly roasted. Maybe these seasonal coffees are not as stale as the Starbucks coffee often found on store shelves. But I digress.

What I really wanted to point out was that the packaging for the new Starbucks seasonal coffee line looks very familiar. A brown (non-valve) bag, with a printed wrap-around-look label with art on the front and tasting notes and a map on the side… You get the picture. If not, here you go:

National Geographic Terra Firma coffee

(Note: As of 2013 it appears that this coffee has been discontinued.)

The National Geographic Society is getting into the coffee business. They are rolling out a line of specialty-grade coffees called “Terra Firma.” They are all be single-origin coffees, from six countries: Brazil, Ethiopia, Sumatra, Kenya, Colombia, and Costa Rica. Net proceeds from Terra Firma coffee will support programs of the Society. Initially, it will only be available in the U.S., to both retail and food service users.

It’s not shade coffee
According to their press release, this coffee is “crafted to emphasize environmental and cultural sustainability in coffee-farming communities.” Further motivation apparently stemmed from results of a survey NatGeo contracted which indicated “being environmentally friendly” influenced the purchasing decisions of a majority of American. Yet although the coffees will be Fair Trade certified, none are certified organic or shade grown (Rainforest Alliance or Smithsonian Bird-Friendly). You’ll have to wait for one of those; there are plans to release an organic or Rainforest Alliance certified coffee in the future.

With all of Nat Geo’s emphasis on the environment, not to mention their long commitment to science, the lack of organic and/or shade certification for the Terra Firma coffees is bound to stick in the craw of educated consumers. The press release states that Fair Trade certification “guarantees…environmental stewardship,” which it does not.

On the plus side, at least we know who is roasting their coffee.
The Terra Firma coffee will be sourced and roasted by the Brazilian firm Café Bom Dia. Americans perhaps best know them as the source of the coffee sold at Sam’s Club and WalMart under the Member’s Mark and Marques de Paiva brands.

Since I last wrote about Café Bom Dia, their web site has had an overhaul and there is additional information about their sustainability efforts, which are certainly the most impressive of any of the large coffee roasters. Their main roasting facility is in Varginha, Minas Gerias, Brazil, where the roasters run on biomass (“sustainably forested eucalyptus” and wood from coffee trees taken out of production). This facility has zero net carbon emissions and is certified CarbonNeutral. This is where the Terra Firma coffee will be roasted.

Specific sources
Café Bom Dia owns and manages farms in Brazil, but also has a network of 4800 producers in all the Terra Firma countries of origin except for Kenya, which will be a new relationship for Café Bom Dia. Because large plantations and family-owned farms do not qualify for Fair Trade status, the Brazilian beans will not come from Café om Dia farms, but from Fair Trade cooperatives in southern Minas Gerias. The specific sources for the beans from other origins will depend on harvests and availability — the usual criteria for large-volume efforts that depend on a particular flavor profile and price point. I was told by that for this initial line of Fair Trade coffees, source cooperatives will not be chosen specifically for their environmental practices.

National Geographic drops the ball
I obviously have a preference for (and encourage people to seek out) coffee in which the specific origins — and therefore growing methods — can be easily traced and explored. In my opinion, the problem with the Terra Firma coffee isn’t that NatGeo partnered with Café Bom Dia. In fact, I commend Café Bom Dia for always being responsive and straightforward with me, and for what I believe to be a more sincere effort to run an eco-friendly business than any other large roaster. Café Bom Dia can and does source organic and Rainforest Alliance certified coffees — it’s what they sell at Sam’s Clubs and WalMart, where their Rainforest Alliance coffees are even 100% certified beans. What is remarkable is National Geographic did not choose these sustainable coffees for their initial offerings.

In preparing this post, I first wrote to Café  Bom Dia with questions about this choice. Café Bom Dia provided much of the information above, including the fact that organic or RA certified selections were planned for the future. I followed up with NatGeo specifically asking about the choice not to initially include more eco-friendly selections. Here is their reply:

While you do raise some interesting questions, we have to defer to Café Bom Dia on the finer points of their coffee production methods.

In keeping with our mission to “inspire people to care about the planet,” we do our best to promote sustainability through our mission-oriented projects, editorial endeavors and licensed products. There are many factors that are taken into account when choosing a new partner: we chose Café Bom Dia because of the company’s commitment to sustainability and its pedigree as a certified Fair Trade supplier.

In recent years, NatGeo has licensed their brand on a wide range of disparate products, including digital music, apparel, and home furniture. Given the serious impacts of coffee growing on the environment, coffee seems like a better fit than many of the other items that display the NatGeo logo. It presents a fantastic educational opportunity — the power of National Geographic to inform consumers about coffee sustainability issues is tremendous. The Society has 8.5 million members, but its reach and respect go far beyond those numbers. It would have sent a strong message if they had chosen to market and promote certified, eco-friendly coffees. Actually, the fact that they did not sends an equally strong one.

Coffee review: Starbucks Organic Shade Grown Mexico

Plainspoken Coffee. A Coffee Review for Ordinary People by Ordinary People, #41.

Starbucks Organic Shade Grown Mexicois produced by around 900 small farmers on 3200 ha of land in the southern Mexican state of Chiapas [1]. Many of the farms are near or adjacent to the El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, which contains the northernmost cloud forests in the world and is considered as one of the greatest biodiversity sites of North America. El Triunfo totals 119,000 ha, of which 93,458 ha corresponds to a buffer zone and the rest to the core areas. Core areas are primary forest owned by the government. The buffer zone consists of privately owned lands, about 60% of which are forested. The remainder is agricultural, with shade coffee being the dominant crop; up to 70% is rustic shade.

Originally this coffee was to be a temporary offering, but proved so popular that it is on the permanent Starbucks menu.

Background

This coffee-sourcing is part of a partnership with Conservation International (CI) which began in 1998. Originally, this was to be a three-year program with CI providing technical assistance to producers encouraging them to continue eco-friendly growing practices, and Starbucks as a dependable buyer. This partnership has continued with some new wrinkles, including the development of Starbucks C.A.F.E. practices.

This project has not been without controversy. One main gripe has been that the contracts with Starbucks paid above-market prices, but the beans went through the large exporter and processor Agroindustrias de Mexico (AMSA), which took a cut of the price. This doesn’t seem like an unusual arrangement and perhaps the only practical one with between a large buyer and dozens of cooperatives. At some point Starbucks did try to deal directly with producers, but the cooperatives were unable to arrange shipment.

Some of the co-ops withdrew from participation. Various reasons have been given. According to CI’s report to USAID [1], when the world price of coffee rose above the price already agreed to in the contracts, producers reneged and sold to other buyers (a not too-uncommon occurrence). Some felt that, after a long struggle for autonomy, that they were once again beholden to middlemen [2]. CI apparently negotiated many of the initial contracts, and some producers later regretted signing when they found out Starbucks was the end buyer (was that not in the contracts?). There were also objections to quality demands being imposed on them.

Nonetheless, the arrangement with Starbucks did and has increased income for many of the farmers. One co-op mentioned as a participant in a New York Times article was identified by a Fair Trade advocate as being organizationally weak, not well suited to judging the quality of their own beans, and unable to seek out other buyers. If that’s the case, this co-op may not be qualified for Fair Trade certification, and therefore Starbucks might be the best option for them, at least at this time.

While there is a lack of publicly available objective information on the outcomes of the Chiapas coffee project, from what I have read it has had an overall positive net impact. Encouraging and promoting organic and shade-grown coffee is a major goal of El Triunfo conservation efforts. At least for some period of time, cooperatives that withdrew from the CI/Starbucks program had a hard time finding buyers, especially those that would pay high prices and invest in their communities. If Starbucks is purchasing an average of 1.7 million pounds of coffee from this area every year, this is likely a good thing, especially if these producers do not have other options for selling their beans.

Finally, we need to bear in mind that this is a certified organic coffee, but it does not have shade certification by Smithsonian or Rainforest Alliance. As mentioned above, however, the coffee grown in this area, especially in the El Triunfo buffer zone, is traditionally grown in the shade, often diverse shade.

Let’s move on to the coffee
Starbucks Organic Shade Grown Mexico is billed as a medium roast. For a company known to over-do the roasting, I was surprised to see that “medium” was actually “medium.” I think good Mexican coffees are delicate and sweet and should be roasted light, but I suppose medium was a good compromise to cater to the tastes of Starbucks customers. I was also surprised to see that in a French press, this coffee was fresh enough to have a decent bloom.

This coffee was what we expected from a Mexican coffee: pleasant, approachable, smooth, and well-balanced. It was fairly sweet with hints of chocolate; a couple people thought that rather than milk chocolate it was a more bittersweet dark chocolate, perhaps due to the roast. One person tasted cinnamon. Overall, comments were quite positive. A few people with known anti-Starbucks sentiments were grudgingly impressed. This is a decent coffee that most people should find more than acceptable. When the votes were tallied, it came away with a solid 3 motmots.

Because of its size, Starbucks falls victim to its own success. Providing a consistent product at such large volumes inevitably means lower quality, buying through exporters (and thus lower prices for producers) and an inability to truly police the growing methods of thousands of farmers. Still, I can think of few other offerings by any of the big roasters that are as positive for the environment as the Starbucks Organic Shade Grown Mexico. It sure beats Kraft’s 30% Rainforest Alliance certified (and 70% mystery-sourced) Yuban, and tastes better to boot.

[1] Conservation International and Starbucks Coffee Company. 2007. The Conservation Coffee Alliance.  USAID Contract # 596-A-00-04-00039-00, Annual and Final Report 2004-2007.

[2] Gonzalez, A. A. and R. Nigh. 2004. Smallholder participation and certification of organic farm products in Mexico. Journal of Rural Studies 21:449-460.

Birds & Beans now available

The Birds & Beans: The Good Coffee web site is now up and running. Since I posted about this initiative, which offers only Smithsonian Bird-Friendly certified coffee, there have been a few tweaks and changes.

  • The price is a tad higher than first announced: two pounds for $19.25 plus shipping.
  • Looks like you can subscribe from anywhere in the U.S., not just New England (Canadian customers should order from Birds & Beans Canada, which has a wider choice of coffees and no subscription restrictions).
  • Right now, they do not seem to be putting the country of origin on any of the bags, and only mentioning Colombia as the origin of the medium-roast coffee on the web site. This might mean they will source from various Bird-Friendly certified farms and focus on a flavor profile. Personally, I think promoting specific origins is a critical part of educating the public. I also think that birders, to whom this line is targeted, would be especially enthusiastic and receptive to the specific stories behind some of the Bird-Friendly certified farms. So much research has been done at some of them, they could put a bird list and photos on the web site — and birders, of all consumers, would totally get this. Big missed marketing opportunity, in my opinion.

There is an attractive page with photos of eight species of migratory birds. I assume that there will be some sort of text accompanying them at some point, as they aren’t even identified. They are all migratory species that breed in North America and winter in the tropics, but not all species that depend on, or even winter in, coffee farms. There are also nice bios of the bird conservationists that have been supporting this effort.

We have been trying out all three varieties of Birds & Beans coffees this week. I had intended on posting a longer review later, but since I will be in Nicaragua when the trial period expires, it looks like now is the time to fire off our first impressions. I won’t rate them with motmots, since they have not been tasted by as many people yet as usual.

These were all roasted by Wicked Joe. No roast date on the package.

The “Scarlet Tanager” dark roast is really dark. Starbucks fans, line up here. I was told this is currently from Peru, and aside from a few small microlots sometimes offered by other roasters, I have yet to meet a Peruvian coffee I really like. So this was not my cup, but I did find it very smooth for such a dark roast. Folks who liked a darker roast in our office that have tried it so far were happy with it.

The medium roast “Chestnut-sided Warbler” was perhaps a tad on the dark side of medium, with all beans showing an oil sheen and many oil spots. There was evidence on some beans that it had been roasted too rapidly (this creates little divots in the beans where rapid expansion pops a hunk off). I presume the actual origin of this is Mesa de los Santos, which has long been the only Bird-Friendly certified farm in Colombia. We’ve reviewed and commented on this origin previously, so I won’t go into the details here. This coffee garnered the most diverse comments. A few wished it had been just a tad lighter so some of the more sweeter tones would emerge. Others got the sweetness right away, and pegged a cherry-like fruit flavor. It was smooth and quite bright for a medium/dark roast.

The light roast “Wood Thrush” was the winner of the group. As of this writing, it is sourced from Mexico, and had the chocolate sweetness one expects from this origin. It was especially good in a French press, where it had character and some complexity. Brewed, it was just a nice, pleasant classic Latin American cup. Overall, it just had more going on in the cup than the other two.

The primary audience for these coffees is birders. Most birders I know drink a lot of dark, pedestrian coffee. I think they will find the Birds & Beans coffee a real step up, but not too different from the flavor and roast profiles they are accustomed to, or so exotic that they don’t “get it.” The “Wood Thrush” will also please those that have somewhat more refined palates. All the coffees should completely satisfy people who really care about habitat and biodiversity preservation and want it fully represented in their cup.

If you try these coffees, please leave some impressions in the comments — both on the taste and your thoughts on the web site and “theme.” I’m especially interested in what birders think!

Green Mountain to fund climate change projects

Green Mountain Coffee Roasters will award four grants of $200,000 each to organizations with ideas to combat climate change in four core areas: transportation-related emissions (including GMCR’s product shipping), threats to coffee-growing communities (enormous, given that climate change is already pushing coffee production to higher altitudes), building political will, and empowering individual action. Grant recipients will also be required to meet with GMCR twice a year to help the company work on reducing and mitigating its own carbon footprint.

The last two grant categories seem a little amorphous, but I’m quite enthusiastic about the potential for development of programs that can help farmers adjust to climate change (for those that can; the solution for many farmers may actually be to transition to other crops, unfortunately).

This grant project is part of a larger effort by GMCR to focus on climate change through changing business practices and raising awareness (you can read their statement on climate change here).

Spending $800,000 in the current economic crisis by a company that sells what is essentially a “luxury” item is, I think, a pretty strong statement of commitment to environmental responsibility. Kudos to GMCR.

 

Trader Joe’s coffee

Trader Joe’s is a specialty grocery store chain with 315 stores nationwide. It was founded by Joe Coulombe in California, with the first store under the Trader Joe’s name opening in 1966. In 1979, the company was purchased by Theo Albrecht, a German billionaire and one of the brothers that founded the ALDI discount supermarket chain; it remains a privately held company in an Albrecht family trust. Although ALDI and TJ’s have always operated as separate entities, many of TJ/’s business practices are right out of the ALDI playbook.

Private labels = low cost = murky transparency

Like ALDI, TJ’s is known for it’s wide range of reasonably priced, private label house brands. Private label brands are manufactured by one company, which remains anonymous, to be sold under the brand of another. Like ALDI, TJ’s is especially secretive about their suppliers [1]. (Update: read more in the Fortune magazine article, “Inside the secret world of Trader Joe’s” from August 2010.)

TJ’s offers over a dozen house brands of coffee. The varieties may provide a country or countries of origin, but other details on the source of the coffee are usually not on the packaging. I wrote two detailed emails and a snail mail letter to TJ’s inquiring about their coffee sourcing and inviting them to highlight their sustainability efforts. I did not get any replies. I’m not alone; TJ’s did not respond to phone inquiries from a reporter seeking comment on their lack of shade coffee criteria.

Who roasts Trader Joe’s coffee?

Nonetheless, some digging indicates that Mountanos Brothers in California has been sourcing and roasting coffee for TJ’s for some time. Mountanos has a wholesale green coffee importing division as well as a retail and roasting arm, which also handles wholesale and private label business.You’ll recognize the familiar fiberboard valve canisters used by both Mountanos and TJ’s.

Trader Joe’s shade grown coffee

Right now in my local store, TJ’s has three varieties labeled as “shade grown” which I’ll explore further:

  • Organic, Fair Trade, Shade Grown Ethiopian Yirgacheffe
  • Organic, Fair Trade, Shade Grown Café Femenino
  • Shade Grown Deep French Roast (blend of Central and South American)

These display organic and/or Fair Trade certification seals, but no shade certification. Remember, there’s no legal definition of “shade.” Roasters have various ways of “verifying” that coffee is shade grown, and it’s usually the word of non-biologists with an interest in getting the coffee sold.

What do we know about the origins of Trader Joe’s coffees that are labeled shade grown?

Ethiopia
Typically, Ethiopian coffee is grown by small holders in garden plots under light shade. The garden plots consist of multicropping of plants such as ginger and cardamom, fruit trees (avocado, papaya), and coffee shrubs planted in the shade of one or a few trees. While there are large government and private plantations, they usually do not qualify for Fair Trade certification and are generally not organic. I surmise that the source of TJ’s Ethiopian coffee (at least a large part of it) is the Oromia Coffee Farmers Cooperative Union (OCFCU), which represents nearly 103,000 producers in 29 cooperatives, about 20% of which are Fair Trade certified. With that many producers, it’s hard to say how many have really biodiverse coffee plots, and there is virtually nothing focusing on the environment on the Oromia web site. But the Oromia project is considered very worthwhile to the members, and if nothing else I believe thwarting poverty also averts environmental exploitation. A cautious thumbs up, if TJ’s is sourcing from Oromia.

Café Femenino
As of this writing, TJ’s Café Femenino coffee comes from Peru (the Café Femenino project is other countries but the basic social principals apply) . This coffee does have a more specific origin noted: northern Peru’s Lambayeque region. These would be the beans from female producers separated from those of the local co-op, CECANOR. Other than the usual mention that the coffee is shade grown, there are few details on environmental initiatives on the CECANOR web site or the web site of Café Femenino’s exclusive importer, Optco.  From what I have read about the Café Femenino project, most of these female producers have very small plots, and many do grow under levels of shade that are more diverse than much of the coffee produced in Peru (see below). It is also a worthwhile project to support. Of the three coffees, this is the one I would say is most sustainable on an environmental and human scale.

Shade Grown Deep French Roast
So what about the coffee that Trader Joe’s highlights in their coffee brochure as their signature shade grown brand, the Shade Grown Deep French Roast?

The eye-popping Paradise Tanager is a species that has been found in Peruvian shade coffee farms, but not in nearby sun coffee.

All we have to go by is that it is a blend of Central and South American beans. It’s highly probable that the South American component comes from Peru, as Colombia and Brazil are not known for either their organic or shade coffee. Peru is one of the world’s largest producers of organic coffee, but their focus on volume has resulted in deforestation in many areas, and it’s likely to be grown under monoculture shade [2]. You have no assurance that just because the coffee is organic, that it is grown under any kind of diverse shade that preserves habitat.

As for a more specific origin in Peru, it’s not Café Femenino, which must be not be blended and must be labeled as such. It may be sourced from other members of the CECANOR co-op, and I’ve also heard that TJ’s sources from COCLA, a huge umbrella organization of 8000 producers.

The problem with determining the sustainability of coffee from cooperatives, especially large ones, is that they comprise a wide range of farming practices, since each farmer manages his own farm independently. Beans in any given shipment of coffee might come from many dozens or hundreds of farms. The majority of the farms in an organic certified co-op may not even be inspected annually.

As for the Central American component, it’s anybody’s guess. A likely source is some of the tons of generic beans coming out of Guatemala, and if they consider Mexico part of Central America, some could also come from there.

Why won’t they be more specific?

Aside from protecting the identity of their suppliers, large volume coffee roasters/distributors use broad geographic descriptors on their packaging to ensure that they have the flexibility to source from a large number of co-ops or farms. If a coffee is labeled “Mexico,” for example, a roaster can source from well over 100,000 producers Imagine the leeway Trader Joe’s has by indicating the source for their Shade Grown Dark French Roast is essentially all of Latin America!

In these instances, Trader Joe’s, and other large roasters, are looking for the best price. By having the option of using so many producers, they also are able to drive down prices by increasing competition between producers. As for quality, these large roasters are aiming for a particular flavor profile — necessarily a rather generic one — and often use darker roasts to cover up flaws in lower-quality beans [3]. While dark roasts are a nod to the public that seems enamored with over-roasted coffee and mistakenly equates “dark” with “strong,” turning a bean black blasts any honest character out of coffee. You are left with coffee that lacks distinction and could be from anywhere. And probably is.

Conclusion

Buying coffee from Trader Joe’s is better than buying Folger’s, Maxwell House, or some other mass-produced brand. But their focus on low price is a double-edged sword, opening a market for farmers who are unable to achieve real quality, but also depressing prices and lowering expectations. And I disagree with the whole concept of anonymous food products. I don’t like to dump on Trader Joe’s. There are a lot of things I like about it. Coffee just isn’t one of them.

The bottom line is that Trader Joe’s shade grown coffees are not third-party verified, and TJ’s offers no explanation as to how they’ve concluded that the coffees they offer are indeed eco-friendly. And because Trader Joe’s does not provide enough information on the origins of most of their coffees, it’s not possible to determine if they are actually grown in a sustainable manner.

Notes:

[1] When it comes to consumable products, this anonymity can be problematic. It can be dangerous, as the current peanut product recall illustrates — at least 10 Trader Joe’s products are part of the recall. Or it may just confuse the consumer, as is the case with organic milk. An increasing volume of organic milk is coming from industrial dairies that are not in full compliance with organic standards. This milk shows up in name brands (Horizon Organic is the brand owned by agribusiness giant Dean’s Foods) and private labels. A comprehensive look at this situation is provided by the Cornucopia Institute, which just came out with an update to its dairy report; the scorecard rates Trader Joe’s private label milk 1 out of 5, stating that TJ’s, like other private label marketers, was unwilling to divulge where they got their milk.

[2] For example, Cerulean Warblers were found in rustic coffee farms in central Peru during a Smithsonian survey in 1998-1999. Follow up surveys in 2006 found this habitat had been eliminated. The coffee was still there, but the diverse native shade trees had been cleared and replaced with young fast-growing species with few leaves and epiphytes; no Cerulean Warblers were found. More commentary on the lack of eco-friendliness of Peru’s organic coffee can be found on Gunnar Engblom’s Birding Peru web site. Gunnar is a transplanted Swedish biologist who is a conservationist and experienced bird guide, operating Kolibri Expeditions out of Lima, Peru.

Engblom, G. 2006. Cerulean Warbler survey in Central Peru January-February 2006. Report to el Grupo Ceruleo, subcommittee of the Cerulean Warbler Working Group, U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station.

Sterling, J., R. Greenberg, W. Widdowson, M. Widdowson, and P Bichier. 1998. Birds of the Villa Rica area, Pasco, Peru. Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center. PDF.

[3] Ken Davids at Coffee Review has a brief discussion on TJ’s over-dark roasts and the problems with bargain-priced Fair Trade coffees.

Paradise Tanager photo by Alan Wolf under a Creative Commons license. Cup photo by Majiscup under a Creative Commons license.