Coffee awards and competitions

Quality, price, and sustainability

I made this comment on my post about Counter Culture’s “Source” initiative:

Fair Trade is such a darling of the green set, but it’s certification is restricted to cooperatives, and does little to address quality.

It’s come to my attention that there is a more profound disconnect between price, quality and sustainability by the public than I first suspected. Although I’ve tried to address these issues here at C&C, perhaps I should be more explicit.

First, the connection between price and quality should be self-evident: you get what you pay for. Cheap (= grocery store, mass-marketed) coffee is never going to be great coffee. Coffee is a living crop; it responds to many environmental variables, not the least of which are altitude (generally, the higher it’s grown, the harder and better the bean) and shade (older varieties will only grow well under shade, and shade coffee matures more slowly, which is believed to intensify flavors in the cup). Coffee is also not a direct plant-to-table crop, and the best coffees are hand-picked and initially processed in a labor-intensive manner. Hence, there is no way to efficiently mass-produce coffee in a mountainous terrain with lots of various shade trees “in the way” by using machinery.

Second, high quality coffee promotes environmental sustainability. No farmer receiving premium prices for his coffee — nor any roaster — wants to see the land depleted and crop quality decline. Coffee grown under sun requires high inputs of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides, and land is subject to erosion and soil loss. Coffee grown in the shade gets nutrients from fallen canopy leaves, has fewer weeds, attracts birds and other wildlife that reduce pests, and maintains soil integrity. Obviously, it also maintains biodiversity. Coffee farmers who care about their land invariably grow coffee in ways that echo natural ecosystems.

Coffee farmers who receive a higher price for their quality coffee are also less likely to exploit their land for other purposes — whether it is turning to less environmentally-friendly but higher paying crops (including drugs), logging, or pasture.

Finally, there is little incentive to producers to grow high quality coffee except price. Let’s see how our buying practices influence prices, and therefore quality, and ultimately sustainability.

  • If you are buying coffee at a grocery store at around US$6/lb., it was purchased as green beans from producers at between US$0.80 to $1.12/lb [1] on the commodity market. These prices are often lower than the cost of production, a sure path to poverty for farmers. Also, it tastes like crap.
  • If you buy Fair Trade coffee, the producers (which are cooperatives, NOT single farmers or estates, which do not qualify for Fair Trade certification) receive US$1.26/lb. The cooperative decides how the money is distributed to member farmers (or if; it may be reinvested in the capital of the co-op, or community projects). Quality and taste will vary. This price is not a hell of a lot higher than the current commodity price [2], and no matter how brilliant the quality, there is no mechanism built into the Fair Trade model that rewards a farmer for it. Great quality Fair Trade coffee is great not because of Fair Trade, but in spite of it.
  • If you are buying a Cup of Excellence or another award winning coffee, farmers are typically getting over US$5.00/lb. Examples of average prices for the top ten coffees received per pound by farmers or cooperatives from recent CoE auctions are $7.40 for the top El Salvadors, and $9.64 for the top Guatemalans. You’ll pay about $15.00/lb for these carefully-grown, artisan-roasted beans — that’s still less than $0.70 per 6 ounce cup! You can often find beans from the same winning farms that were not part of the CoE auction lot which are usually just as good and cost far less.

The connections between price, quality, and sustainability are much more deep and complex than this (or at 200+ posts I wouldn’t still be at the “scratch the surface” level of this blog). But if you are buying Fair Trade coffee because you believe it is the best mechanism to insure that farmers are paid a fair price or even a living wage, you may want to consider a broader picture, do some research, and try buying the best quality coffee you can afford.

[1] Cost pass-through in the U.S. coffee industry/ERR 38. Economic Research Service, USDA. (PDF).

[2] The day I wrote this in early July 2007, the composite indicator price on the New York Board of Exchange for green commodity coffee was US$1.06.

Recent sustainability awards

Rainforest Alliance Cupping for Quality. This event was started in 2004 as a competition for Rainforest Alliance certified coffees. The most recent cuppings took place last December and in April, with over 100 samples submitted. There are many top-flight sustainable coffees available; I was disappointed to see that most of these coffees scored under 90 points (specialty coffee = 80 or greater).

Here are the top farms:

  1. La Esmeralda, Panama, 90.04. Arguably, the most famous and pricey specialty coffee in the world.  We offered background here and a review here. It also won first place in the SCAA 2007 Roasters Guild Cupping Pavilion Competition earlier this month (for the third year in a row), and the Best of Panama, once again, last month. We have a jar on my desk to save up to try this one again. It just sold at auction for $130/pound, $80 more per pound than last year, it is just not worth it.  It was very distinctive and interesting, but this pricing reflects novelty/celebrity status.
  2. Carmen Estate Coffee S.A., Panama, 88.96.
  3. Santa Teresa, El Salvador, 88.25. (All bourbon coffee from four farms, from western El Salvador in Ahuachapan, is milled at the Santa Teresa Estate.)
  4. Finca Medina, S.A., Guatemala, 87.46 (Antigua;10% of the farm is regenerated native forest.)
  5. Grupo Aguadas de Caldas, Colombia, 87.04.

SCAA Sustainability Awards.  Established in 2004, this award recognizes specialty coffee companies that have created innovative projects to expand sustainability within the coffee world while inspiring others to initiate similar endeavors. These are the winners for 2007 announced earlier this month.

  • Poabs Organic/Biodynamic Estates, India. In the Nelliyampathy hills in the Western Ghats (Palakkad district, Kerala), pioneers of organic farming not only of coffee, but also tea and other crops.
  • Selva Negra Coffee Estate, Nicaragua. Sustainable coffee producer — read about their shade production, which incorporates Smithsonian Bird-Friendly criteria.
  • International Paper Company and Green Mountain Coffee Roasters. For producing the first hot beverage cup made from fully renewable resources (ecotainer), a compostable corn-based material produced in a greenhouse-gas neutral manufacturing process.
  • SOPPEXCCA, Jinotega, Nicaragua. Cooperative alliance of coffee producers with many community initiatives, as well as a move from conventional to organic production.

Rainforest Alliance Green Globe Awards. RA honored companies which significantly advanced the goals set forth by the Rainforest Alliance and have integrated environmental and social sustainability into their work at their 20th anniversary gala last month. Honored were:

    • Caribou Coffee. Caribou has made a larger commitment than any other big coffee house to buying RA-certified beans, and they are up-front about exactly how much they use. By 2008, Caribou Coffee has pledged that 50 percent of its coffees will come from Rainforest Alliance-certified farms. Caribou Coffee’s lines that currently bear the seal, and the percentage certified in each blend include:    — Daybreak – 50 percent
      — Colombia – 100 percent
      — Guatemala El Socorro – 100 percent
      — Caribou Blend – 75 percent
      — Fireside Blend – 30 percent
      — Espresso Blend – 75 percent
      — French Roast Blend – 75 percent
      — Reindeer Blend – 30 percent
      — Perennial Blend – 30 percent
      — Amy’s Blend – 50 percent
  • Nestlé Nespresso SA. Okay, this is why I take a somewhat dim view of some of RA’s work. This recognition is for their AAA Sustainability Program. I’ve read through their whole web site, and the emphasis here is more on quality than environmental practices, and seems to lack stringent environmental criteria. Although this is a partnership with RA, it is not indicated that RA certification criteria are even required.  Some of the individual projects seem quite worthwhile. But even if we could agree that this particular program is completely righteous, it supplies 30% of Nespresso’s beans (50% by 2010).  Nespresso is a subsidiary of Nestlé and represents only a small amount of the total  beans purchased by this huge company which has a poor track record on many environmental issues, including pollution, water rights, and recycling (read more at Responsible Shopper).  I just can’t get behind rewarding a company like this unless they make an across-the-board effort to clean up their act.
  • Another award went to “innocent”, a UK smoothie brand.

Bolivian Cup of Fair Trade

The C&C tasting panel’s favorite coffee, among tough competition, is still Paradise Roasters’ Calama Marka Bolivia Cup of Excellence, which is now, sadly, sold out. In that review, I discussed the cancellation of the 2006 Bolivian Cup of Excellence, due to political foolishness. Gary Howe of Traverse City, MI was kind enough to leave a comment on a follow-up post, pointing me to his blog, where he talks about his recent trip to Bolivia to attend the Cup of Fair Trade event.  He includes a slide-show clip describing the event, featuring his really outstanding photography (wow!).

Gary went to Bolivia with Chris Treter, of Higher Grounds Trading Co., a northern Michigan roaster.  Their web site looks completely unfamiliar to me, yet I know their name well. I swear the last I checked their site, they did not offer online ordering, so they did not end up in my righteous roaster list.  Whether I’m right and things have been updated, or if I just completely missed the boat, they have now been added to the sidebar and interactive roaster map, and are on my “to try” list.

Thanks to Gary for bringing both Higher Grounds and the Cup of Fair Trade event to my attention.  I really would love a report on the winning farms!

Roast Magazine Roaster of the Year 2006

Roast Magazine has just announced the winners of their 3rd annual Roaster of the Year Award.

Macro Category
Winner: Intelligentsia (Chicago).  It’s hard to say too many good things about Intelly’s commitment to great coffee, from the farm to the cup.  Read this super article about green coffee buyer Geoff Watts, and this note from Geoff regarding Fair Trade and Direct Trade.
Runners-Up: Coffee Bean International and Portand Roasting (both Portland, OR)

Micro Category

Winner: Metropolis Coffee (Chicago)
Runners-Up: Cinnamon Bay Coffee (Clearwater, FL), Sacred Grounds (Aracta, CA)

All these roasters offer at least some environmentally-friendly coffees, a great testament that sustainability does not sacrifice quality. Congrats to these roasters.