• Home
  • About
  • Sustainable Basics
  • Reviews
  • Glossary
  • Bibliography
"Sustainable coffee is produced on a farm with high biological diversity and low chemical inputs. It conserves resources, protects the environment, produces efficiently, competes commercially and enhances the quality of life for farmers and society as a whole."
-- Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center, First Sustainable Coffee Congress overview paper


C&C Clipmarks feed
C&C Clipmarks home

« The problems with sun coffee | Main | Is promoting shade-grown coffee really a good conservation strategy? »

What is shade grown coffee?

Coffee (Coffea sp.) is a small understory tree or shrub, and has traditionally been grown amongst forest trees, in the shade. Various studies indicate that arabica coffee has the highest yields under 35 to 65% shade. In addition, growing coffee under shade also discourages weed growth, may reduce pathogen infection, protect the crop from frost, and helps to increase numbers of pollinators which results in better fruit set. Coffee grown in the shade takes long to ripen and is often thought to taste better because the long ripening times contribute to complex flavors. 

However, in order to produce faster, higher yields and prevent the spread of coffee leaf rust (Hemileia vastatrix), many coffee plantations began to grow coffee under sunnier conditions. The fewer shade trees that are in coffee plantations, the less biodiversity there is in those plantations.

This loss of biodiversity, especially in birds, has led conscientious consumers to look for "shade grown" coffee.  However, coffee is grown under a continuum of conditions, from rustic or traditional, to full sun, and these "shades of shade" are not all equal when it comes to the health of ecosystems. Unfortunately, there is no official definition of "shade grown," so coffee so labeled may be grown under what are technically shady conditions, but which are little better full  sun.

It is important to understand the various levels of growing coffee under shade.  This lists the five most typical categories, from the most desirable, traditional growing method, to the least diverse, most modern and technified method.

  • Rustic. Often used on small family farms. Coffee is grown in the existing forest with little alteration of native vegetation. Tree species are diverse, with an average of 25 species. Shade strata (layers of vegetation) three or more. Shade cover = 70-100%.
  • Traditional polyculture. Coffee is grown under a combination of native forest trees and planted tree and plant species, including fruit and vegetables both for the farmer and for market, fuel wood, medicinal plants, etc. Common tree species under which coffee is frequently grown include Inga, Grevillea, Acacia, Erythrina, and Gliricidia. Shade cover = 60-90%.
  • Commercial polyculture. More trees removed in order to increase the number of coffee plants, and shade is provided mostly by planted timber and fruit trees. Canopy trees are regularly pruned, and epiphytes are typically removed. More often ivolves use of fertilizers and pesticides due to the lack of vegetative cover which helps prevent loss of soil nutrients, etc. Typically only two vegetation layers, the canopy, and the coffee. Shade cover 30-60%.
  • Shaded monoculture. Dense plantings of coffee under an overstory of only one or two tree species (usually Inga), which are heavily pruned. Epiphytes are removed. Shade cover = 10-30%.
  • Full sun. Lacks a tree canopy, or has a few isolated trees. No shade cover.

And here is a diagram from a paper by Patricia Moguel and Victor Toledo [1] to help you visualize the categories:

Shadelayers1

As you can see, coffee grown in a shaded monoculture could technically be labeled "shade grown," but it would probably not be what the consumer, concerned about biodiversity, is looking for.

Several organizations are working to certify shade grown coffees that are grown under conditions that preserve biodiversity, including the Rainforest Alliance and the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center.  You can read more about their certification methods here.

There are pros and cons to the certification process, including the cost to the farmers and roasters (particularly expensive in the case of SMBC), and problems with applying one-size-fits-all biodiversity criteria to different regions. Some roasters offer shade coffee that is not certified, but evaluated in various ways. Some say they use independent auditors, or visit the farms themselves. I don't know how many, if any, of these evaluators have experience in actually assessing biodiversity, from a scientific viewpoint.  I'll be working on a list of these roasters, and their evaluation methods, and provide my results in another post.

Smithsonian also provides a thorough history of coffee growing methods.

[1] Biodiversity Conservation in Traditional Coffee Systems of Mexico. 1999. Conservation Biology 13:11–21.

Comments

We've been buying "Organic Shade Grown" Costa Rican coffee from Cafe' Britt. We really enjoy this coffee, but I don't see this company specifically mentioned in any way on your website. I did see a note that Costa Rican shade coffee is often from a monoculture, so fear that we have been duped. Do you have any further information on this product? Website: http://www.cafebritt.com/estore/index.cfm?view=154&item=2042&Sub=197

Cafe Britt is an intensively marketed brand that comes from farms across much of Costa Rica (they roast 2-3 million pounds annually), many (most) of which are sun or close to sun coffee. Costa Rica has embraced sun coffee more than any other Central American country, and allows the use of "shade coffee" for coffee grown on farms with only one tree species, heavily pruned, scattered around the farm. Costa Rica is one of three countries which have national coffee growing laws and which have converted largely to technified coffee that make me hesitate to buy coffee from them at all (the other two are Brazil and Colombia). It takes research, and when there are so many other good sustainable coffees around, it is not worth the effort.

I have been working on a complete post about Costa Rican coffee, it will appear this week, so check back!

Thanks very much for your question and taking time to comment.

I'm looking forward to reading more about sustainable Costa Rican coffees. In December I had purchased several Cafe Britt shade coffees. I hope I wasn't duped.

I enjoy your postings. Good coffee reviews are hard to find, much like good wine reviews. However, while I grow my own grapes and make homemade wine, I don't have that same luxery with coffee, which is why Michael Arnold, Eugene/Creswell, Oregon

I wrote a post on Costa Rican coffees and in it mentioned Cafe Britt. I followed up with another coffee from CR that is sustainable. Hope those posts are helpful to you!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Beans, etc.


  • See the list of Recommended Responsible Roasters at the bottom of the page!




More favorites at the
Coffee & Conservation Amazon store




Move your mouse over me, I'm pretty




Featured at Low Impact Living


Featured on Yahoo's Green Picks



Nature Blog Network

Best Green Blogs

Green Product Reviews, Discussion Forums and Wikis at Huddler Green Home


Drop me a line

Recommended Responsible Roasters (rotating)

  • Find more roasters near you on our interactive map

Featured Posts